top
top
top
top
top
Articles and essays

NOTES ON STEINBECK, THOMPSON AND THE AMERICAN DREAM


INTRODUCTION

Long time readers of TGTH might remember this odd work, when I used to have a John Steinbeck section on my site in Geocities. I see certain Steinbeckish qualities in HST, and they are the two authors I have consistently read and have consistently loved. After a couple of requests, I found the file again and have touched it up. I won't be taking any new comments for it, because I know I'll lose them in my emailbox. However, spout off in The Owl Farm Kitchen, which I read all the time.

People always ask me, how can a patriotic Canadian be so much into HST? I find Americans fascinating, actually, and I won't say too much in case I hurt anyone's feelings, but I find the US to be a strange, self-destructive nation, clinging to long ago exploits while decrying their current situation. I also don't like American TV. It amazes me how long a show like Full House can run, yet The Powers That Be failed to make it. Norman Lear will always get my vote over Bob Saget. HST is a weird combination of that - an old fashioned gentleman who won't hesitate to gas bomb his own local tavern. In my Grade 9 history textbook (yeah, we study you guys intensely here) there was a fantastic famous painting of "Manifest Destiny", this beautiful woman striding across the land with a book in one hand while telephone lines were being built in the background. Think of it, the American Dream. Just what is it? A recent issue of Better Homes and Gardens suggested it was owning your own home, yet this painting, which I can never get out of my mind - does it mean that the USA has the right to all the "Americas"? Is this why NAFTA went through so easily or why Cuba antagonizes so many? It is such a paradox, yet there are so many things that are ultimately American, like fast food stands and Reaganomics. Like I said, fascinating. On with the essay.

Christine O
August 23, 1998



Two writers who come quickly to my mind whenever I hear or see images of American patriotism are John Steinbeck and Hunter S. Thompson. As different as these two men are, their writing is similar in that the American Dream constantly fails their characters. Both seek to define America and the American Dream, however, it remains seemingly elusive, and both writers fail to find it.

I choose Steinbeck and Thompson because, to me, their writing styles are the same. They have the same lust for language and powerful writing. Their subjects are contemporary; they are not necessarily moral or upright, but are average people. Both view the world in the same sad way, that people are as easily led to beauty as deceit, joy to sorrow and life to death. Their are certain truths in their writing that is not expressed elsewhere; consequences that we might not always like to believe exist. I also choose Steinbeck and Thompson in that they are representative of the twentieth century. Steinbeck neatly covers the first half more or less, and Thompson from the sixties to present.

Both authors have also experienced a number of failures. Steinbeck has been called sentimental, overdrawn, boring and grossly contrived. While this may be true, for example, the killing of Candy's dog as a metaphor for the killing of Lenny in Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck received attention after Tortilla Flats was published. Since then, he has become one of the most popular authors of the twentieth century and won a Nobel Prize in Literature in 1962. Thompson, who has been called names less polite, continues to be a dynamic force in modern American writing, because he broke conventional rules of writing and journalism. Thompson, who flunked out of Columbia, also worked hard before gaining fame for Hell's Angels. His popularity continues today with his cult following of fans. Rather interesting is that both men are alcoholics.

One of Steinbeck's last books is Travels With Charley in which the old man and his poodle take a road trip in a custom built truck named Rosinante. This book is my least favourite; here, sentimental, overdrawn, boring and grossly contrived apply greatly. Steinbeck records faithfully how he procured his truck, meets with his sons one last time before setting off, then churtles across the country, interviewing cowboys and common people. He makes brief comments on current events such as Nikita Kruschev; but other than that, fails to find America. In fact, I would say that the book, subtitled "In Search of America", is a lame attempt at personal journalism. Personal journalism is only worth reading if something exciting or out of the ordinary happens, and takes a certain touch. (As human beings, we tend to go for the exciting. In Travels, Steinbeck may as well have printed how many times he changed his underwear). Travels is a failure all in itself, as Steinbeck throws his characteristic prose out the window.

Thompson also goes on the road. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream, while a smashing success, is a two-fold failure. First, Thompson and his attorney (Oscar Zeta Acosta; the attorney is never named, except, some think, in the urgent speed letter as Dr. Gonzo) also fail to find the American Dream. With all its opportunities for sex, drugs, and money, they simply can't find it, no matter how hard they try. The second failure is one on part of Thompson; he edited the manuscript at least five or six times, destroying his goal of "buying a big fat red notebook and writing things basically as they happened". The book is not true gonzo journalism, as it had been tainted by editing as well as Acosta's threats of libel.

Perhaps the heart of the American Dream for these two writers is Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath and Thompson's Hell's Angels and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Grapes was written near the end of the Great Depression and published in 1939. Interestingly enough, Steinbeck almost failed to finish his epic and it was only when his first wife suggested the title, that he could resume finishing it. Grapes is a study in failure - of the land, of the government, of society and people in general. Because of the drought, families such as the Joads are not able to produce food or profit and are pushed off the land that their family had fought for for generations. The Joads, like other dispossessed people of the time, became nomadic and travelled to California, having placed their faith in handbills distributed by canneries and farms. However, they fail to find the American Dream, or, rather, the American Dream fails them. They are unable to make anything out of nothing except pity and sadness. Perhaps the ultimate testimony to this is the miscarriage of Rosasharn's baby. This is a metaphor for fertility; the land cannot produce anything nor people themselves. In Chapter Twenty, Steinbeck makes his dissertation on failure. While science can make all sorts of wonderous new grafts and varieties of fruit, it cannot make the fruit available to those who need it most. Instead, it is left to rot in the sun.

Thompson began his journey to find the American Dream in Hell's Angels. Here, he describes the migration of Linkhorn mentalities from the east to the west, California in particular. Near the end of the book, he writes a prophetic statement about the American Dream, of these strange bike riders who are "useless in a highly technical economy". Uneducated, relatively unskilled and just too weird, the Angels stand for an emerging society that has never experienced such a phenomonem before. Thompson then developed his theory in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

This then brings us to the question: Just what the heck is the American Dream? It is a strange concept, defined by painting of goddesses with large books and holding telegraph wires, felt in the stirrings of the heart during the national anthem, the idea that anyone - regardless of status, race or creed - was created equal in the eyes of God and capable of becoming successful and wealthy through hard work, God-fearedness and just by being on American soil. The American Dream is a severe form of nationalism, and one that has been used as a red herring fallacy in many arguments. It is also a fantasy formation of sorts; despite crumbling urban centers, racial problems and nuclear paranoia (as Thompson points out in the final chapters of Hell'sAngels), advertising and other popular media images still uphold the idea of America as the land of the free.

In both Grapes and Fear, the characters are even accused of being un-American. Once in California, the Joads and their friend Casey (the preacher) hear strange talk of "reds". The reds, are of course, communists, and those who are not communists but want to offer people a better standard of living. It is talk of unionizing that ultimately leads to the death of Casey and why young Tom Joad must leave his family. He swears to live out Casey's dream. Thompson, while sitting in a bar in Aspen, finds a former astronaut (whose name was deleted at the insistance of publisher's lawyers), hassling a band that plays songs with some un-American sentiments. Thompson, as Raoul Duke, admonishes the bullish spaceman - "Hey, I'm an American and I agree with every word he says,". When the astronaut is asked by a young boy for an autograph, the spaceman is aghast when the boy rips the slip of paper up, proving just how worthless the spaceman's "heroism" is.

So where do we go from here? Is the American Dream all meaningless imagery and puffery symbolism? Or is it something attainable, like money and power? Does it actually exist? If so, why does it elude so many writers and everyday people?



OPINIONS

I am writing this from your page on Steinbeck and Thompson, where you ask for comments on The American Dream and it's apparent failure.

The American Dream is basically that upward mobility in our society is possible. A man dreams of one day having the little plot to call his own, works hard and gets it. A person can do what they want, regardless of where they start from. The classic example is the Horatio Alger story of winning through pluck and luck against all odds and arriving at the top.

In America, you at least have the opportunity to do this.

In most other countries, this is not the case. You are born into one caste or another and there you stay for life. Japan is a perfect example. There is an rich upper class and a poor lower class that works itself literally to death. There is little or no mixing of the two. India is the same way. And so is England, for the most part (c.f. the punk movement of the seventies). This is why it's the AMERICAN Dream.

The concept of The Failure Of The American Dream is rooted in the common fallacy that people and opportunity are equal in America. No matter how close to an egalitarian society we have, there are still tremendous obstacles to upward mobility, especially for most ethnic groups. The game is rigged, as it were. The romantic fantasy is that through hard work and perseverence, you automatically come out on top; if you follow the rules and do what you're supposed to, everything will be OK.

The truth is that people are largely cannibalistic and will attack and devour you if given the chance. People lie to each other. Appearances are more important than substance (c.f. politicians). People seek to control others and profit from their labors, if not steal directly from them. Employers are the worst of the lot. You can work hard, produce tremendous wealth for them and still go to the early grave penniless. Now THAT'S the failure of the American Dream. It's like following the map's directions exactly and winding up where you started instead of where you want to go.

As an engineer-turned-businessman, one of the first rules I learned was that others will do whatever they can to knock you back. This is not just because they want to relieve you of your patents, property, etc. for their own aggrandizement. It is because there is an unspoken law that there is not enough at the top, therefore those already there must exclude all others. The rules say there's an open market, but the reality is that there are barriers and obstacles. The rules say that the terms of contracts are supposed to be honored, but the reality is that people will try to get away with whatever they can. Nice guys finish last, as it were.

There is also the sporting nature of those in power, marionetting others about for their own perverse amusement. To truly succeed in business, you have to treat it like a game. The others aren't there to help you score points, but to block your shots. Even when it's in their direct interest to not do so, they will hinder you. Lording power over others is a powerful aphrodisiac to those that do it and those who get to watch from the sidelines.

The Failure of the American Dream basically means that the rules were followed, the myths believed, but the expected result did not materialize.

This sort of thing pervades all of our society. You believe in the legal fictions of a government of, by and for the people, but then are confronted with the reality that the real control is behind the scenes. You're told that the justice system and police are there to protect you, but their primary interest is arrests and convictions, regardless of guilt or innocence. The President goes on and on about his War On Drugs, but his V.P. is the ex-head of the CIA and probably involved in bringing tons of cocaine into the country to ensure cash flow to South America and a steady increase in prison populations (who goes to jail? Fred the addict or DeLorean the dealer?) You sign a lease for a house, and when you move out the landlord keeps the deposit illegally and contrary to the terms of the lease. You send your money to Jimmy Swaggart so he can spread the Word of The Good Book, and he uses it to hire prostitutes. And so forth.

Thompson's Lono book hits the nail right on the head in a chapter called "Why Do They Lie To Us?" There, the real estate folks promote a tropical paradise and deliver hell on earth. A nearly identical theme appears later on in Lono, as well as in The Great Shark Hunt. This time, it's sport-fishing boat owners promising the trophy marlin or giant shark, but delivering nothing but a bill for $500 a day. At the end of Lono, Thompson goes right for the jugular and makes an admirable, though weak, attack on religion.

In Hell's Angels, he writes about the sense of being cut off or left out of whatever society you're supposed to be a part of. And how the Angels are the only honest people there are (they never lie to each other). Here, the failure is that these guys feel they never even got the chance to play the game, let alone win.

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas tells of his refusal to play by the official rules. Instead of following the law and doing "what he was supposed to", he comes right out and does whatever he wants. The message is: the only way to win is to play the game the same way everyone else does: ruthlessly and selfishly. I guess the Failure of The American Dream here is that in order to get ahead, one must ignore morality, ethics, conscience. Success demands disposing of civility and a regression to lower-animal status. The rules say, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", but the reality is "It's every man for himself."

"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man." This appears at the front of F&L in Las Vegas.

This can mean at least two things. One, that copious ingestion of anesthesiums dulls pain. The other is more subtle, however. A man that becomes a ruthless beast is going to get ahead of the pack and thus enjoy security and a lifestyle unavailable to someone who remains civil and plays by the rules. The pain of being a man is to endure the usual condition of being the puppet on strings, serving others and having nothing to show for it.

For me, there is no greater pain than the feeling that I'm being screwed. It's screw or be screwed, apparently. I read once about a guy who claimed his real business degree was earned at Screw U.


TO TRY AND TIE STEINBECK AND THOMPSON TOGETHER IN THE SAME LITERARY BACKYARD...IS KINDA LIKE PUTTING A FERRET IN A FOXHOLE......(NOT SURE WHOM IS WHICH...INDESCRIMINATE TYPING...)...ONE THING ABOUT STEINBECK IS THAT HE IS TRULY AN OPTIMIST...THOMPSON ON THE THE OTHER HAND IS NOT SO EASILY DEFINED...STEINBECK HAS THE MUCH MORE CLEARLY DEFINED "WRITERS VOICE"...CRAFTED?.....THOMPSON....DEFINETELY SCATOLOGICAL...AND I HEAR YOU WITH YOUR "TIE" TO THIS "AMERICAN DREAM THING" AND HOW YOU MIGHT MELD THE TWO BECAUSE OF THE "ON THE ROAD" JAZZ...BUT AGAIN THEY DIFFER....STEINBECK=NOVELIST....THOMPSON=JOURNALIST...HEY ..I LIKE EM BOTH..I DO.....HAVE NO "REAL" PREJUDICE EITHER WAY..AND NOW THAT I THINK OF IT..I COULD READ EM BACK TO BACK...AND FEEL LIKE I"M NOT CHANGING GEARS SO MUCH....HAH.....ANYWAY.......STEINBECK SITS AT HEMINGWAY'S KNEE AND THOMPSON AT HIS FEET.....


Very thoughtful essay. Just an observation here; why do so many foreigners become so successful when they reach America? It seems to me that many Americans do not have a clue as to the benefits we have living here. I think we forget that just the opportunity to succeed is a basic freedom that eludes many people on this planet. While Americans pontificate and analyze why so many have so little, people from other countries thrive under freedoms they never experienced in their own countries. The American Dream has always been there, buts its attainment depends on having the perspective to see what opportunities are in front of you.



fire starBack to top

[HOME] * [HUNTER S. THOMPSON & FRIENDS]
[BOOKS] * [ARTICLES AND ESSAYS]
[ROADS/LINKS] * [PICTURES] * [FUN]

NOTE AND DISCLAIMER

EMAIL
Sign My Guestbook
View My Guestbook