OPINIONS
									I am writing this from your page on Steinbeck and Thompson, where you ask for
									comments on The American Dream and it's apparent failure.
									
									The American Dream is basically that upward mobility in our society is
									possible. A man dreams of one day having the little plot to call his own,
									works hard and gets it. A person can do what they want, regardless of where
									they start from. The classic example is the Horatio Alger story of winning
									through pluck and luck against all odds and arriving at the top.
									
									In America, you at least have the opportunity to do this.
									
									In most other countries, this is not the case. You are born into one caste or
									another and there you stay for life. Japan is a perfect example. There is an
									rich upper class and a poor lower class that works itself literally to death.
									There is little or no mixing of the two. India is the same way. And so is
									England, for the most part (c.f. the punk movement of the seventies). This is
									why it's the AMERICAN Dream.
									
									The concept of The Failure Of The American Dream is rooted in the common
									fallacy that people and opportunity are equal in America. No matter how close
									to an egalitarian society we have, there are still tremendous obstacles to
									upward mobility, especially for most ethnic groups. The game is rigged, as it
									were. The romantic fantasy is that through hard work and perseverence, you
									automatically come out on top; if you follow the rules and do what you're
									supposed to, everything will be OK.
									
									The truth is that people are largely cannibalistic and will attack and devour
									you if given the chance. People lie to each other. Appearances are more
									important than substance (c.f. politicians). People seek to control others
									and profit from their labors, if not steal directly from them. Employers are
									the worst of the lot. You can work hard, produce tremendous wealth for them
									and still go to the early grave penniless. Now THAT'S the failure of the
									American Dream. It's like following the map's directions exactly and winding
									up where you started instead of where you want to go.
									
									As an engineer-turned-businessman, one of the first rules I learned was that
									others will do whatever they can to knock you back. This is not just because
									they want to relieve you of your patents, property, etc. for their own
									aggrandizement. It is because there is an unspoken law that there is not
									enough at the top, therefore those already there must exclude all others. The
									rules say there's an open market, but the reality is that there are barriers
									and obstacles. The rules say that the terms of contracts are supposed to be
									honored, but the reality is that people will try to get away with whatever
									they can. Nice guys finish last, as it were.
									
									There is also the sporting nature of those in power, marionetting others
									about for their own perverse amusement. To truly succeed in business, you
									have to treat it like a game. The others aren't there to help you score
									points, but to block your shots. Even when it's in their direct interest to
									not do so, they will hinder you. Lording power over others is a powerful
									aphrodisiac to those that do it and those who get to watch from the
									sidelines.
									
									The Failure of the American Dream basically means that the rules were
									followed, the myths believed, but the expected result did not materialize.
									
									This sort of thing pervades all of our society. You believe in the legal
									fictions of a government of, by and for the people, but then are confronted
									with the reality that the real control is behind the scenes. You're told that
									the justice system and police are there to protect you, but their primary
									interest is arrests and convictions, regardless of guilt or innocence. The
									President goes on and on about his War On Drugs, but his V.P. is the ex-head
									of the CIA and probably involved in bringing tons of cocaine into the country
									to ensure cash flow to South America and a steady increase in prison
									populations (who goes to jail? Fred the addict or DeLorean the dealer?) You
									sign a lease for a house, and when you move out the landlord keeps the
									deposit illegally and contrary to the terms of the lease. You send your money
									to Jimmy Swaggart so he can spread the Word of The Good Book, and he uses it
									to hire prostitutes. And so forth.
									
									Thompson's Lono book hits the nail right on the head in a chapter called "Why
									Do They Lie To Us?" There, the real estate folks promote a tropical paradise
									and deliver hell on earth. A nearly identical theme appears later on in Lono,
									as well as in The Great Shark Hunt. This time, it's sport-fishing boat owners
									promising the trophy marlin or giant shark, but delivering nothing but a bill
									for $500 a day. At the end of Lono, Thompson goes right for the jugular and
									makes an admirable, though weak, attack on religion.
									
									In Hell's Angels, he writes about the sense of being cut off or left out of
									whatever society you're supposed to be a part of. And how the Angels are the
									only honest people there are (they never lie to each other). Here, the
									failure is that these guys feel they never even got the chance to play the
									game, let alone win.
									
									Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas tells of his refusal to play by the official
									rules. Instead of following the law and doing "what he was supposed to", he
									comes right out and does whatever he wants. The message is: the only way to
									win is to play the game the same way everyone else does: ruthlessly and
									selfishly. I guess the Failure of The American Dream here is that in order to
									get ahead, one must ignore morality, ethics, conscience. Success demands
									disposing of civility and a regression to lower-animal status. The rules say,
									"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", but the reality is "It's
									every man for himself."
									
									
									"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man." This
									appears at the front of F&L in Las Vegas.
									
									This can mean at least two things. One, that copious ingestion of
									anesthesiums dulls pain. The other is more subtle, however. A man that
									becomes a ruthless beast is going to get ahead of the pack and thus enjoy
									security and a lifestyle unavailable to someone who remains civil and plays
									by the rules. The pain of being a man is to endure the usual condition of
									being the puppet on strings, serving others and having nothing to show for
									it.
									
									For me, there is no greater pain than the feeling that I'm being screwed.
									It's screw or be screwed, apparently. I read once about a guy who claimed his
									real business degree was earned at Screw U.
									
							
									TO TRY AND TIE STEINBECK AND THOMPSON TOGETHER IN THE SAME LITERARY
									BACKYARD...IS KINDA LIKE PUTTING A FERRET IN A FOXHOLE......(NOT SURE WHOM IS
									WHICH...INDESCRIMINATE TYPING...)...ONE THING ABOUT STEINBECK  IS THAT HE IS
									TRULY AN OPTIMIST...THOMPSON ON THE THE OTHER HAND IS NOT SO EASILY
									DEFINED...STEINBECK HAS THE MUCH MORE CLEARLY DEFINED "WRITERS
									VOICE"...CRAFTED?.....THOMPSON....DEFINETELY SCATOLOGICAL...AND I HEAR YOU
									WITH YOUR "TIE" TO THIS "AMERICAN DREAM THING"   AND HOW YOU MIGHT MELD THE
									TWO BECAUSE OF THE "ON THE ROAD" JAZZ...BUT AGAIN THEY
									DIFFER....STEINBECK=NOVELIST....THOMPSON=JOURNALIST...HEY  ..I LIKE EM
									BOTH..I DO.....HAVE NO "REAL"  PREJUDICE  EITHER WAY..AND NOW THAT I THINK OF
									IT..I COULD READ EM BACK TO BACK...AND FEEL  LIKE I"M NOT CHANGING GEARS SO
									MUCH....HAH.....ANYWAY.......STEINBECK SITS AT HEMINGWAY'S KNEE  AND THOMPSON
									AT HIS FEET.....
							
									Very thoughtful essay.  Just an observation here; why do so many foreigners
									become so successful when they reach America?  It seems to me that many
									Americans do not have a clue as to the benefits we have living here.  I
									think we forget that just the opportunity to succeed is a basic freedom
									that eludes many people on this planet.  While Americans pontificate and
									analyze why so many have so little, people from other countries thrive
									under freedoms they never experienced in their own countries.  The American
									Dream has always been there, buts its attainment depends on having the
									perspective to see what opportunities are in front of you.